How did damage caps impact Titanic survivor lawsuits?

On Behalf of | Aug 9, 2023 | Admiralty & Maritime Law, Blog

The Titanic sank on April 15, 1912. It was a major news story since the advertising for the boat had called it unsinkable. Plus, the accident led to the deaths of over 1,500 people.

While history largely focuses on the horrors of the sinking, the aftermath was equalling as appalling. It is common to think that litigation is a relatively new approach to situations like this. People often say we live in a litigious society these days, but after the Titanic incident, there were multiple lawsuits.

An interesting case

Americans associated with the Titanic passengers and survivors in the U.S. filed multiple lawsuits in the District Court for the Southern District of New York in 1913, asking for over $16 million in compensation for loss and injuries. They wanted the Titanic’s ownership, Oceanic Steam Navigation Company, to pay for negligence.

A fight ensued over which laws should pertain to the tragedy. British law would allow the claimants to receive much higher compensation, closer to what they were asking. American law had a much lower cap.

The U.S. Supreme Court eventually ruled in favor of the company, applying the Limited Liability Act, and capping the damages. The case settled in July 1916 with the company paying only $664,000. Plus, the claimants had to agree to accept that the company had no knowledge of any negligence on the boat.

A raw deal and a lesson

The claimants lost out on that settlement. They barely got anything from the company, including an admission of wrongdoing and responsibility for the thousands of deaths and the trauma that survivors went through. This is a good lesson in looking into applicable laws prior to filing a lawsuit as they could greatly impact your ability for fair compensation.

Rated By Super Lawyers | Rising Stars | Taylor Hale |
The National Trial Lawyers | Top 40 Under 40
Top Lawyers of Acadiana | Acadiana Profile Magazine | 2019

RSS Feed

FindLaw Network